December 21, 2007 9:11 AM PST

Why all Vista users should upgrade to Windows XP

XP

Say hello to your new friend.

(Credit: Microsoft)

Now that Microsoft has announced the availability of the RC version of Service Pack 3 for our old friend, XP, I'm delighted to tell you all that not only is this upgrade substantial and extremely helpful. Believe it or not, this upgrade creates the best Windows experience I have ever used.

Now, as you may be aware, Vista is, well, crap. Sure, SP1 is on the way early next year and the hope is still there that Microsoft may be able to turn it around, but let's face it -- the chances of Vista becoming a wanted OS are dwindling by the minute.

Let's see what has gone down with Vista over the past year: Dell, HP and Acer have all asked Microsoft to extend XPs availability for an additional six months due to the concerns of customers; many businesses have been slow to adopt the new OS because of poor performance and compatibility issues; complaints have soured the release claiming Microsoft's new OS is slower, less capable and downright awful; and last but certainly not least, it's as if Microsoft can't stand Vista considering the level of detail it's releasing on its follow-up, Windows 7.

And yet, during this time, Windows XP has still been in use by millions of people around the world that have no desire to buy a new machine that's capable of handling Vista and running it daily. And while some people claim the same was true when XP was made available and people just need to come around, let us not forget that Vista has been available for almost a year and people are still upset about the way things are going.

But luckily for us, there's a savior in the works that will not only help us get out from under the sinking ship that is Vista, but will actually improve our experience using Windows. No, it's not SP1. The real upgrade to Vista is XP SP3.

In case you haven't tried it out just yet, the best way I can describe SP3 is that it's Vista without the crap. Amazingly, Microsoft has said that SP3 features about 1,073 fixes and adds some nifty features from Vista to make the experience far better.

Although XP was faster than Vista before, SP3 ups the ante. Believe it or not, witnessed speeds on XP have easily eclipsed Vista and the latter feels dreadfully slow after using SP3 for a while. Even better, SP3 doesn't offer the kind of annoyances that have become commonplace with Vista -- you know, device incompatibility, annoyances with pop-ups asking for permission, and downright poor performance.

Perhaps most important, SP3 delivers on security. SP3 adds support for FIPS 140-1 Level 1 cryptography as a DLL at the kernel level. Because of this, developers can now access the Kernel Mode Cryptographic Module and improve the security of their drivers with the help of cryptographic algorithms.

On top of that, SP3 fixes Windows' wonky black hole router detection system and allows it to reconfigure the Transmission Control Protocol to keep connections alive without losing any performance.

Sure, this may not seem like big improvements and most of the fixes included in SP3 can already be found on Vista, but isn't that the issue here? Now that XP is more secure and already supports any and all devices you're currently using without costing you hundreds of dollars to implement, couldn't it be said that XP is simply the better choice?

In the end, Vista is nothing more than a beta release of an operating system that should not have been allowed into the wild. Does it have its virtues? Of course it does. But with the release of SP3 (the final build will be available in 2008), which improves upon SP2 and includes most of those Vista virtues, why should you run to the store, upgrade your computer and buy a new operating system?

I just don't see the point.

Honestly, I must congratulate Microsoft on a job well done. Sure, it has lost its focus, gutted its new operating system just to get it out the door, buckled under the pressure of computer manufacturers who hate its new OS and created a ludicrous version scheme that does nothing but confuse people, but it has done something right: it has created a stellar upgrade to Windows Vista.

Save your money -- install SP3 and forget about Vista.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Digital Home
Why Sega should release a new console
The Digital Home 15: The Violent Video Game Edition
2010 will be an important year for Microsoft
What does the file sharing strikeout mean to us?
Why the iPhone will be open to all GSM carriers this year
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 44 comments (Page 1 of 4)
by kevin5151 December 21, 2007 9:40 AM PST
Your words are good to hear. I just recieved a new laptop with Vista installed as a gift. This is my first "hands on" with this O.S. I thought the computer was a ripoff, but now I know what the problem is. VISTA. Thanks for the input.
Reply to this comment
by yipcanjo December 21, 2007 9:57 AM PST
Honestly... I just don't see why there is so much lamenting over Vista. I use it. I enjoy it. I wouldn't go back to XP -- either at home or at work.
Reply to this comment View reply
by pdskep December 21, 2007 10:16 AM PST
I love Vista as well. I remember similar grumblings about XP when it came out. Always a bunch of haters when MS does something new.
Reply to this comment View reply
by pdskep December 21, 2007 10:16 AM PST
I love Vista as well. I remember similar grumblings about XP when it came out. Always a bunch of haters when MS does something new.
Reply to this comment
by yipcanjo December 21, 2007 10:17 AM PST
By the way.... why is Vista performing more slowly a surprise at all? I can certainly run Windows 98 *much* faster than Vista on my current box. I can run Win95, NT4 or Win2k *much* faster than Vista on my current box. Problem is, none of those OSes are doing the work that Vista is doing -- either with security, UI enhancements, media enrichment, built-in searching and so forth. I would also venture a guess that OSX is slower than OS9 on comparable hardware running similar tasks, though I don't see many Mac users actually caring about that stuff.
Reply to this comment
by lbj51 December 21, 2007 10:24 AM PST
Here's a suggestion - dump both and get a Mac for a far more stable and user-intuitive OS. And, if you just have to use Bill's crap - you can do that too.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by Simul4ti0n December 21, 2007 10:25 AM PST
The comment above is typical of mac users, so close minded.
Reply to this comment View reply
by lbj51 December 21, 2007 10:30 AM PST
I'm not closed-minded. I use XP professional on my business laptop, Vista on one of my home desktops, and OSX on my Mac. I prefer the Mac OS, but that's just me.
Reply to this comment View reply
by SheriffBooth December 21, 2007 10:51 AM PST
Don "M$ Naysayer" Reisinger Vista's got its kinks but it's definitely progressive, and once you learn the features you like and don't like you can get it configured to run very smoothly. And I'm sure the reason M$ is still supporting and upgrading XP is because of the gigantic amount of business machines that are running 1gig or RAM or less on XP - it's a better business move for M$ to ease these folks into the future by supporting the past than by forcing them to choose between Vista or nothing. But the bottom line is if you're upgrading your PC to something with 2gigs RAM, I say get Vista because it's a new wave of functionality and configurability. But if you hate change because it's different, by all means stick it out with XP.
Reply to this comment
by aztec92154 December 21, 2007 11:15 AM PST
Bottom line: I love Mac OS X and Windows XP! At work I use Windows XP for my embedded programming work, and at home I have a Mac with both the Windows OS and the Unix based Mac OS. Vista WAS a pain because our software team had to figure out how to port our software to it. I still wouldn't dare develop any serious product on the platform because, I have absolutely no reason to (that is unless our customer base migrate to it). Apple has said "Time Machine", "Spotlight Search", ect would make developers and end-users move to newer versions of Mac OS. Whats Windows Vistas' Killer APP for embedded developers?
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About The Digital Home

  • Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

    Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.


View all Digital Home podcast episode blog entries


Don on Twitter

Follow Don at Twitter

Don's del.icio.us bookmarks:

More...



advertisement
Click Here.
On GameSpot: Banjo and Kazooie return on the Xbox 360
Visit other CNET Networks sites: